Materials Supply Chain
July 14, 2014
As an accident of natural selection, humans have ten fingers. This ten digit body plan is actually pervasive among species, so the apparently random choice of ten, and not eight or twelve, happened early in evolution. Such similarities among species are called homologies, and Darwin cited these as evidence for a common ancestor. It was easier for nature to use the same simple structures, so these persisted with just small variation.
We have ten fingers, so our arithmetic is decimal. We tend to use whatever nature has given us. Our civilization is likewise built from the materials at hand. We use a lot of wood, and we found many millennia ago that scratching into Earth's crust a little can give you precious stones, and such useful metals as copper, silver, and gold. Later, we learned to extract iron from mined ores; and, much later, we learned how to make synthetic diamonds.
Fortunately, the Earth didn't solidify into a homogeneous mass. Because of thermochemical forces, some elements were concentrated into ores, and some geographical regions have more of one kind of ore than another. Rare earth elements, which are useful for making catalysts, photovoltaics and permanent magnets, have been mined in the United States, India, Brazil, and South Africa, but China is now the leading producer.
In a previous article (Rare Earth Shortage, June 21, 2010), I described how China had started to limit exports of these elements, and this policy has continued. China's limiting of rare earth exports has encouraged the reopening of mining operations elsewhere, but there's still the problem of extraction. As are many other chemical processes, extraction of rare earths from ore and their purification are not that environmentally friendly; but, how else can we get our motorized automobile windows?
The rare earth elements are not the only chemical elements that are part of the high technology products we wouldn't want to live without. In a previous article (Energy Elements, May 11, 2011), I wrote about a joint report of the The American Physical Society (APS) and the Materials Research Society (MRS), "Energy Critical Elements: Securing Materials For Emerging Technologies." [1-2] This report highlights the importance of many of the rare earth elements and other elements important to energy technologies; viz.,
This report recommends product design for recycling and research and development on substitute materials. One mitigation technique cited in the report, but not likely to be popular, is lifestyle adaptation. No automatic automobile windows for you!
The US Department of Energy released a December, 2010, report on Critical Minerals Strategy. This report highlights as "most critical" the rare earth elements, dysprosium, neodymium, terbium, europium and yttrium. Indium is also named as a most critical material. One interesting fact about indium, and a good reason for research on substitute materials, is that indium is a byproduct of zinc production. It's not likely that you would mine more zinc just to get more indium.
As if mineral scarcity wasn't enough, we now need to worry that our technology contains extracts from conflict minerals. These minerals are the technology equivalents of blood diamonds that are used to fund armed conflicts in Africa.
Although "3TG" might sound like a new cellphone service, this shorthand actually represents the four principal conflict minerals; namely, tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold. In the US, a miscellaneous provision of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 required companies to disclose the sources of these materials in their products.
Rulemaking by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, which was charged with the oversight for this law, wasn't completed until 2012. Since that time, US companies have attempted to track the mineral sources of their products. The first reports were due on May 31, 2014.
As can be imagined, this is a difficult task for many companies, since it applies not only to products that they make, but also to products that they have made for them by contractors. In a May 29, 2014, filing, Apple, Inc. reported that "...all tantalum smelters in its supply chain had been designated 'conflict free'..." As for the other metals, a majority were either certified as conflict free, or have been found to be so by an independent auditors. Says Apple,
|This graph illustrates how the US ceded its dominance in rare earth production to China in the mid-1980s. (Via Wikimedia Commons.)|
"Apple will keep up the pressure until all unaudited smelters and refiners are either certified or removed from Apple's supply chain."
Intel announced early this year that all its microprocessors would be free of conflict minerals.
In its own report, Honeywell, Inc., a large diversified manufacturer of such things as jet engines and building thermostats, wrote that it sells 915,000 products using materials from 24,000 direct material suppliers. Honeywell does not deal with conflict mineral suppliers, directly, so it relies on reporting from its own suppliers. It has begun to require conflict mineral compliance into its new purchase agreements.
- Robert Jaffe, Jonathan Price, Murray Hitzman and Francis Slakey, "The Back Page - Energy Critical Elements," APS News, vol. 20, no. 4, March, 2010.
- Energy Critical Elements: Securing Materials for Emerging Technologies, A Report from the APS Panel on Public Affairs Committee and the Materials Research Society (MRS), February 2011.
- Critical Minerals Strategy (US Department of Energy, December, 2010).
- Conflict Minerals Disclosure for January 1 to December 31, 2013, Apple Inc., May 29, 2014.
- Conflict Minerals Report for the Year Ended December, 2013, Honeywell, Inc.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Natural selection; human; finger; species; randomness; random; evolution; homology; homologies; Charles Darwin; common descent; common ancestor; nature; Bone; whale; fin; Wikimedia Commons; arithmetic; decimal; civilization; material; wood; millennium; millennia; Earth's crust; gemstone; precious stone; metal; copper; silver; gold; iron; mining; mine; ore; synthetic diamond; Austria; Austrian; Minnesota; coal; fuel; Industrial Revolution; Thomas Edison; Earth; freezing; solidification; homogeneous mass; thermochemistry; thermochemical forces; chemical element; geography; geographical region; rare earth element; catalyst; photovoltaic; permanent magnet; United States; India; Brazil; South Africa; China; export; chemical reaction; chemical process; purification; environmentally friendly; electric motor; motorized; automobile; window; Cartesian coordinate system; graph; high tech; high technology; American Physical Society; Materials Research Society; energy technology; lanthanum; ruthenium; cobalt; cerium; rhodium; helium; praseodymium; palladium; lithium; neodymium; osmium; rhenium; samarium; iridium; silver; europium; platinum; gadolinium; terbium; dysprosium; gallium; ytterbium; germanium; lutetium; selenium; scandium; indium; yttrium; tellurium; recycling; research and development; lifestyle; United States Department of Energy; by-product; byproduct; zinc; technology; conflict resource; conflict mineral; blood diamond; armed conflict; Africa; mobile phone; cellphone; Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; company; rulemaking; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; independent contractor; Apple, Inc.; smelting; smelter; audit; auditor; Intel; microprocessor; Honeywell, Inc.; conglomerate; diversified manufacturer; gas turbine; jet engine; thermostat; purchase order; purchase agreement; thermal expansion; bimetallic strip; spiral; electrical switch; mercury.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- The Wisdom of Composite Crowds - April 27, 2017
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008