April 2, 2014
Smell (more properly, olfaction) is one of our five senses, and it surely exists as an evolutionary advantage we share with other animals. One purpose of smell is to distinguish between good foods and those that are spoiled or not that nutritious.
One other purpose of smell is as an aid in finding a mate. Animals emit complex chemical vapors called pheromones to signal their presence. Since pheromone sense is not as developed in humans as in animals, we augment our own odor with perfume and cologne. These work, since I still associate certain perfume scents with past girlfriends. I wrote about some aspects of our sense of smell in a previous article (Smell, October 23, 2013).
Early chemists would identify some chemicals, such as sulfites, by the odor they emitted when heated. They would also use taste to identify chemicals. Accidental tasting of chemical residue on his hand is how Constantin Fahlberg discovered saccharin in 1878. Tasting your chemicals is now a prohibited practice.
The perception of odor was merely qualitative throughout most of human history until it was realized that what we smell is a direct consequence of the mixture of chemicals arriving at our nose. Gas chromatography is a method of analysis of volatile chemicals; and, combined with a mass spectrometer, it will identify precisely which chemicals produce a specific odor. It will also identify an odor without human presence.
In the real world, it's not possible to carry a cubic meter of equipment with us for the chemical analysis of odors, such as those from spoiled food, so scientists have been developing electronic noses. Electronic noses work by either charge or mass detection.
In the former case, odorant molecules adsorbed on a selective receptor layer direct charge to a metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor or a conducting polymer layer. In the later case, the added mass of the adsorbed molecules is detected by a quartz crystal microbalances or a surface acoustic wave device.
Although the sense of smell is well developed in many animals, humans can readily distinguish subtle differences in odors, and the number of fragrances for sale in a department store perfume section will attest. How many different odors are identifiable to a human? That's the question that a team of scientists from The Rockefeller University (New York, NY) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (New York, NY) addressed in a recent study published in the journal, Science. The surprising answer is more than a trillion.[1-5]
Of course, such a study involves human subjects, and these were presented with mixtures of 10, 20, or 30 components from a library of 128 chemical compounds. Based on an analysis of the collected data, it appears that a trillion might be a lower limit of the human capacity to distinguish different odors. This capability far outweighs our capacity for recognizing colors (2.3 - 7.5 million), and different tones (about 340,000); and it is a far stretch from a 1920s estimate that humans can discriminate between 10,000 odors.[1-3,5]
The odors that we perceive in our environment don't arise from a single chemical. They're a mixture of many. The scent of a rose has 275 chemical components, although a few of these dominate.[3,5] To simulate the odor spectrum, the research team used 128 chemical, such as those with scents like citrus, mint, tobacco, garlic, but they created mixtures that had unfamiliar odors. They were neutral odors that were neither very pleasant nor very unpleasant.
In the experiments, twenty-six test subjects, aged 20-48, were presented with three vials of chemicals at a time, two of which were identical. They were asked to choose the odd vial, and they did this in 264 trials each. When the numbers of chemical components overlapped by more than 51%, the test subjects had difficulty discriminating the scents. This allowed an estimate of how many unique scents could be identified if the test subjects were presented with all possible mixes of the 128 odor molecules.[2-3,5]
We have the capability to distinguish so many distinct odors because the human nose has about 400 types of scent receptors, and these outperform the other senses in discriminating between stimuli.[1-3] Says study coauthor, Andreas Keller, "My hope is that this helps to dispel the myth that humans have a bad sense of smell." However, our olfactory sense is still far behind that of dogs, whose sense of smell is 1,000-10,000 times more sensitive.
- C. Bushdid, M. O. Magnasco, L. B. Vosshall and A. Keller, "Humans Can Discriminate More than 1 Trillion Olfactory Stimuli,", Science, vol. 343, no. 6177 (March 21, 2014), pp. 1370-1372.
- Jessica Morrison, "Human nose can detect 1 trillion odours," Nature News, March 20, 2014.
- Will Dunham, "Sweet smell of success: human nose discerns giant array of odors," Reuters, March 20, 2014.
- Joseph Stromberg, "The Human Nose Can Distinguish Between One Trillion Different Smells," Smithsonian Magazine, March 21, 2014.
- Sniff study suggests humans can distinguish more than 1 trillion scents, Rockefeller University Press Release, March 20, 2014.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Smell; olfaction; sense; evolutionary advantage; animal; food; nutrition; nutritious; marriage; mate; chemical compound; vapor; pheromone; body odor; perfume; cologne; girlfriend; chemist; sulfite; odor; heat; taste; Constantin Fahlberg; saccharin; carbon; hydrogen; oxygen; nitrogen; sulfur; Wikimedia Commons; qualitative property; human history; nose; gas chromatography; mass spectrometry; mass spectrometer; cubic meter; analytical chemistry; chemical analysis; food spoilage; electronic nose; electric charge; mass; molecule; adsorption; adsorbed; olfactory receptor; metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor; conductive polymer; conducting polymer; quartz crystal microbalances; surface acoustic wave device; aroma compound; fragrance; department store; scientist; The Rockefeller University (New York, NY); Howard Hughes Medical Institute (New York, NY); scientific journal; Science; trillion; Chanel No. 5; Russian; Ernest Beaux; aldehyde; formaldehyde; citronellal; human subject research; human subject; chemical library; color; pitch; tone; 1920s; environment; rose; citrus; mint; tobacco; garlic; experiment; vial; sensory receptor; stimulus; Andreas Keller; dog; 17th century; oil on wood painting; German; proverb.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008