August 20, 2014
I don't know why American songwriter, Hoagy Carmichael, decided to name his classic 1927 composition, "Stardust." Although there is such a thing as "star dust," this is an odd juxtaposition of words for someone who isn't an astronomer. Then again, this is a strange song, since it's a song-about-a-song. Strange though it is, it was popular enough for the US Library of Congress to add Carmichael's 1927 recording of it to the National Recording Registry.
Stardust, or cosmic dust, is formed by stars, which emit the dust slowly, or in violent supernovae. The dust, with particle size ranging up to about a hundred micrometers, goes into building the next generation of stars, but most of it floats between stars. In the early days of astronomy, when all observations were in the visible light spectrum, the dust was a nuisance, since it obscured astronomical objects.
Darkening of the night sky by cosmic dust was once considered as the solution to Olber's paradox, which reasoned that the night sky should be white, not black. The reasoning was that there would always be a star at every small patch of sky in a universe of infinite age and extent populated by an infinite number of stars. Kepler saw this as an argument that the universe was finite; but, if there are obscuring dust clouds, wouldn't this also explain the dark night sky?
In reality, this couldn't be the case, since the dust would eventually heat to incandescence as it reaches a thermodynamic equilibrium with the the energy emitted by the stars. What actually causes the dark night sky is cosmic redshift. Because of the expansion of the universe caused by the Big Bang, the light of older stars is shifted into the infrared, and the earliest light of the universe has shifted all the way to microwave frequencies as the cosmic microwave background.
Today, most astronomical observations are done outside the visible light spectrum, and observations of the infrared emission of cosmic dust have elucidated properties of our Milky Way Galaxy. NASA's Stardust spacecraft was launched on February 7, 1999, to collect dust samples from the diffuse region around comet, Wild 2.
As I wrote in a previous article (Carbon Nano-Aerogel, March 14, 2011), the Stardust dust collector was an aerogel, as shown in the photograph. Since the Stardust spacecraft was also flitting around space for an extended period before the return of the comet dust samples to Earth in January, 2006, it had a secondary mission to collect cosmic dust.
A recent article in Science, authored by 67 scientists from various international institutions, plus 30,714 Stardust@home "dusters," presents evidence that the Stardust Interstellar Dust Collector captured seven interstellar dust grains.[3-8] Interestingly, fifty particles of spacecraft debris were captured, also. The seven particles are diverse in size, elemental composition, and crystal structure, and they present some essential data for theorists.
Since cosmic dust grains travel at high speeds, up to 5 kilometers/second, the aerogel was designed to gently slow them for capture. The first hurdle in analysis was the "needle in a haystack" problem of detecting the expected few, small grains in the large aerogel volume. This task was crowd-sourced to a team of more than 30,000 "dusters," who scanned millions of Internet images of slices of the aerogel looking for particle tracks. The images were obtained by changing the focus of a camera to image at different depths.
More than a hundred tracks were flagged in this first analysis of just 77 of the 132 aerogel panels.[4-5] Twenty-nine of these were found to have been particles ablated from the spacecraft itself. In the end, a careful analysis of impact direction was required to identify 31 tracks for careful analysis, and three interstellar dust particles were found in the aerogel.[6-7] The Internet volunteers did the equivalent work of a single person working forty hours a week for three years.
Four additional particles were found in the aluminum foil that surrounded the aerogel. The aluminum foil was not intended as a dust collector, but scientists try to extract as much data as they can from expensive projects. These particles contained the unexpected element, sulfur. Said physicist Rhonda Stroud of the Naval Research Laboratory,
|Interstellar dust particles collected by NASA's Stardust spacecraft. The left image is the so-called Hylabrook dust mote, showing olivine crystals (red) surrounded by noncrystalline magnesium silicate. The center particle, called Orion, also contains the crystalline minerals, olivine and spinel, plus an amorphous material comprised of magnesium, and iron. The right image is the 35 micrometer track of a 3 picogram particle that vaporized on impact. (Left image, from STXM data, by Anna Butterworth, via UC Berkeley; center image, Westphal et al. 2014, Science/AAAS, via DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Press Release; right image, Westphal et al. 2014, Science/AAAS, via DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Press Release.|
"They were splatted a bit, but the majority of the particles were still there at the bottom of the crater... Their diversity was a surprise, but also these fluffy particles, sort of like a tossed salad, were complex, an agglomeration of other particles, rather than one dense particle suggested by the simplest models of interstellar particles."
At this time, all particle analysis has been non-destructive. Says Andrew Westphal, a physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory and the lead author of the Science paper, "Despite all the work we've done, we have limited the analyses on purpose... These particles are so precious. We have to think very carefully about what we do with each particle." The seven particles are each a different silicate, and the two largest particles have a fluffy composition, similar to that of a snowflake, while only dense particles were expected.
Fifty-five aerogel panels still haven't been searched for particle tracks, but the most interesting analysis would necessarily be destructive. That would be a measurement of the relative abundance of three stable isotopes of oxygen. The abundance ratios would confirm that the particles came from outside the Solar System. The Internet search for additional particles has just begun, and a search for tracks in the aluminum foils will be added to the Internet effort.
Aside from NASA, additional funding for Stardust has come from the Klaus Tschira Foundation, the Tawani Foundation, the German Science Foundation, and the National Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium.
- You can hear Hoagy Carmichael's original version of Stardust on YouTube, here. The popular Nat King Cole cover is here, and Frank Sinatra's version is here.
- Stardust Mission Page, NASA.
- Andrew J. Westphal, et al., "Evidence for interstellar origin of seven dust particles collected by the Stardust spacecraft," Science, vol. 345, no. 6198 (August 15, 2014), pp. 786-791.
- Release Kate Greene, "Mysteries of Space Dust Revealed," Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Press Release, August 14, 2014.
- Robert Sanders, "Seven tiny grains captured by Stardust likely visitors from interstellar space," University of California Berkeley Press Release, August 14, 2014.
- Michael D. Lemonick, "Captured Space Dust Is Probably From Beyond Our Solar System," National Geographic, August 15, 2014.
- Ian Sample, "Dust from beyond our solar system fell to Earth from space probe," The Guardian (UK), August 14, 2014.
- Maria Dasi Espuig, "Cosmic grains pre-date Solar System," BBC, August 14, 2014.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: American; composer; songwriter; Hoagy Carmichael; musical composition; Stardust; cosmic dust; star dust; astronomer; US Library of Congress; National Recording Registry; star; supernova; micrometer; metallicity; population I stars; astronomy; visible-light astronomy; visible light spectrum; night; celestial sphere; sky; Olber's paradox; universe; infinite; Johannes Kepler; cloud; Heinrich Wilhelm Matthias Olbers (1758-1840); Wikimedia Commons; heat transfer; incandescence; thermodynamic equilibrium; energy; redshift; expansion of the universe; Big Bang; light; infrared; microwave; frequency; cosmic microwave background; Milky Way Galaxy; NASA; Stardust spacecraft; coma; diffuse region; comet; 81P/Wild; Wild 2; University of California Berkeley; aerogel; silicon dioxide; silica; fused quartz; silica glass; Science; author; scientist; Stardust@home; Stardust Interstellar Dust Collector; debris; chemical element; elemental; crystal structure; theory; theorist; olivine; crystal; amorphous solid; noncrystalline; talc; magnesium silicate; crystal; crystalline; spinel; amorphous solid; magnesium; iron; picogram; vaporization; vaporize; impact; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; DOE; kilometer; second; needle in a haystack; volume; citizen science; crowd-sourcing; Internet; image; focus; camera; direction; volunteer; aluminum foil; sulfur; physicist; Rhonda Stroud; Naval Research Laboratory; tossed salad; scientific model; nondestructive testing; University of California, Berkeley; Space Sciences Laboratory; silicate mineral; snowflake; density; stable isotopes of oxygen; ratio; Solar System; Klaus Tschira Foundation; Tawani Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; German Science Foundation; National Fund for Scientific Research; Flanders, Belgium.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008