September 24, 2014
The Pleiades (Πλειαδες) were the seven nymph companions of Artemis, the Greek goddess of the hunt and the protectress of young girls. The nymphs were depicted as nubile maidens, and I'm reminded of the nymphs when I see Sir Galahad's experience at a certain castle in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
The Pleiades star cluster, also known as Messier 45, is named after the nymphs. The Pleiades are quite close to us by astronomical standards, and the stars are easily visible by the unaided eye. In fact, the ability to resolve the individual stars of the Pleiades was an ancient eye test.
Galileo Galilei, who was the first to view the Pleiades through a telescope, saw that there were many more stars in that region than the few observed with the unaided eye. Galileo published a sketch of the Pleiades with 36 stars in the Sidereus Nuncius (1610). Armed with telescopes and an emergent understanding of astrometry, astronomers have measured the distance to the Pleiades. The following table shows some historical estimates of that distance.
As can be seen from the table, the Hipparcos Satellite value, which was a parallax measurement anticipated to be highly accurate, is quite a bit removed from the others. This has caused considerable puzzlement since it was published in 1997. The Hubble Space Telescope measurement was based on visual magnitudes as interpreted by a fit to the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. The optical interferometry value was made using the orbital parameters of the double star, Atlas, in the Pleiades.
As I wrote in a previous article (Parallax and Stellar Aberration, August 29, 2012), parallax is a simple geometrical technique for distance measurement. As a young Boy Scout, I learned the parallax method for measuring such things as the width of a river, as shown in the following figure.
|Modern artists enjoy painting nude nymphs, but Medieval artists preferred their nymphs to be chaste, as in this circa 850 illustration.|
The Pleiades were Alcyone, Celaeno, Electra, Maia, Merope, Sterope, and Taygeta.
(From a folio, circa 830-840, at the Leiden University Library, via Wikimedia Commons.)
To measure stellar distances, you need to use trigonometry instead of this geometrical method. Using two extremes of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun, you can observe how the angular position of a star changes against the background of the "fixed stars" (see figure). In fact, the common stellar distance unit, parsec, is defined as the distance for which there is a parallax of one arcsecond. For those who like large numbers, a parsec is equal to 9,460,730,472,580 kilometers.
|Distance measurement of the width of a river using similar triangles.|
Since triangles ABC and OPC are similar, we can calculate OC knowing OA, AB, and PO.
(Figure rendered by the author using Inkscape).
Radio astronomers, using a worldwide network of radio telescopes, has recently measured the distance to the Pleiades to a high precision by an absolute trigonometric parallax measurement using very long baseline interferometry.[2-6] The astronomers are from the University of California (San Diego, California), the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (Cambridge, MA), the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (Socorro, NM), the California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, California), and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Hilo, HI). Their study revealed that the distance to the Pleiades is 136.2 ± 1.2 pc (444.25 ± 3.9 ly). This result is in agreement with the more than a dozen previous measurements using multiple techniques.
The Hipparcos distance measurement, which is out of line with all the others, would have been a problem for stellar theorists. The short distance meant that the hydrogen-burning stars of the Pleiades had some peculiarity, such as a high fraction of helium in their interiors. Astronomers were worried that some long standing theories would need revision. Carl Melis, the first author of the study and an astronomer at the University of California in San Diego, is quoted by Nature as saying, "If we don't understand young stars, we're kind of hosed."
Mellis and his colleagues created a huge, intercontinental array of radio telescopes for the Pleiades distance measurement. This network included the many telescopes of the US Very Long Baseline Array that extends from Hawaii to the Virgin Islands, the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia; the William E. Gordon Telescope of the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico, and the Effelsberg Radio Telescope in Germany.[5-6] This large array of telescopes synthesized an Earth-sized virtual telescope that allowed a very accurate position measurement. The Pleiades distance was measured through observations of five of its stars, two of which were a binary pair, over the course of eighteen months.
This brings us to what might have happened with Hipparcos. The Hipparcos satellite, launched in 1989 by the European Space Agency, measured the parallax of 118,000 stars.[3,5] The Hipparcos data was used to generate a three-dimensional map of our locality in 1997. Hipparcos, however, could not use the "fixed stars" as a reference, since it could not detect distant galaxies. Instead, the parallax distances were calculated on a self-consistent basis with respect to the entire 118,000 catalog of stars.
Hipparcos measured 53 Pleiades stars, in contrast to the four of the present study, so you would think that it would be a more accurate measurement. The satellite however, had technical problems. During launch, a booster rocket failed to fire, the satellite was placed in a highly elliptical orbit, and corrections had to applied to the data. Not only that, but the Pleiades are in a region of sky for which such corrections are difficult. Another possibility is that bright stars might have saturated the detector, although the Hipparcos team discounts that suggestion.
It's important to address such sources of error, since another satellite, Gaia, was launched in 2013 to measure distances of about one billion stars, including hundreds in the Pleiades.[5-6] Gaia, however, can use distant galaxies as its fixed stars reference. It's hoped that having such a reference point will prevent the type of systematic error that may have spoiled the Hipparcos measurement.
Stellar parallax diagram. A parsec, defined as the distance for which there is exactly an arcsecond's parallax, serves as an astronomical measure of distance. Distance is computed as the reciprocal of the parallax angle, since these angles are small and the tangent of the angle is nearly equal to the angle itself. (Wikimedia Commons image, modified by the author using Inkscape.)
- Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975, Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones, Directors) on the Internet Movie Database.
- Carl Melis, Mark J. Reid, Amy J. Mioduszewski, John R. Stauffer, and Geoffrey C. Bower, "A VLBI resolution of the Pleiades distance controversy," Science, vol. 345, no. 6200 (August 29, 2014) pp. 1029-1032.
- Léo Girardi, "Perspective - One good cosmic measure," Science, vol. 345, no. 6200 (August 29, 2014) pp. 1001-1002.
- Mark Zastrow, "Row reignites over distance of Pleiades star cluster," Nature News, August 28, 2014.
- Ken Croswell, "Astronomers measure precise distance to controversial star cluster," Science, August 28, 2014.
- Radio Telescopes Settle Controversy Over Distance to Pleiades, National Radio Astronomy Observatory Press Release, August 28, 2014.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Pleiades; nymph; Artemis; Ancient Greece; Greek; Greek mythology; goddess; hunt; virginity; young girl; nubile; maiden; Sir Galahad; castle; Monty Python and the Holy Grail; artist; nude; Medieval; chastity; chaste; Alcyone; Electra; Maia; Merope; Sterope; Wikimedia Commons; Pleiades star cluster; Messier 45; astronomy; astronomical; star; naked eye; unaided eye; angular resolution; resolve; eye examination; eye test; star cluster; visible-light astronomy; visible light; Atlas; Pleione; Galileo Galilei; telescope; sketch; Sidereus Nuncius (1610); astrometry; light year; stellar parallax; Hipparcos Satellite; Hubble Space Telescope; Optical Interferometry; parallax measurement; accuracy and precision; accurate; apparent magnitude; visual magnitude; regression analysis; Hertzsprung–Russell diagram; optical interferometry; orbital element; orbital parameter; binary star; double star; geometry; geometrical; Boy Scout; river; similar triangles; triangle; Inkscape; stellar; trigonometry; Earth; orbit; Sun; angle; angular; fixed stars; parsec; arcsecond; kilometer; multiplicative inverse; reciprocal; tangent; radio astronomy; Radio astronomer; radio telescope; trigonometric; very long baseline interferometry; University of California (San Diego, California); Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (Cambridge, MA); National Radio Astronomy Observatory (Socorro, NM); California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, California); Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Hilo, HI); August; February; Alexandra Angelich, NRAO/AUI/NSF; theoretical physics; theorist; stellar nucleosynthesis; hydrogen-burning star; helium; theory; Carl Melis; author; Nature; colleague; Very Long Baseline Array; Hawaii; United States Virgin Islands; Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope; West Virginia; William E. Gordon; Arecibo Observatory; Puerto Rico; Effelsberg Radio Telescope; Germany; aperture synthesis; month; European Space Agency; data; three-dimensional; map; galaxy; consistency; self-consistent; technology; technical; booster rocket; elliptical orbit; photodetector; detector; Gaia; systematic error; Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975, Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones, Directors).
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- The Wisdom of Composite Crowds - April 27, 2017
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008