Science and Engineering Employment
September 2, 2013
The STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) are specialized occupations, so it's not always possible to find your first, or next, job where you presently live. For a known reason, half the members of the American Mathematical Society relocate to the Washington, D.C., area. The rest of us end up dispersed across the country.
My wife and I enjoyed living in Pittsburgh during my post-doctoral years at the University of Pittsburgh, but my first "real" job took us 350 miles east to Northern New Jersey. It could have been worse, since I had overtures at another research location 1,600 miles to the west. Since my wife and I originated in the Northeast, New Jersey was a comfortable choice.
The National Science Foundation has just published statistics on the regional concentrations of scientists and engineers in the United States. As an undifferentiated group, we're rather uniformly distributed among the states, although it's understandable that some specialties (e.g., oceanography) might be concentrated along the seacoasts. There would also be hot spots for experimental high energy physics.
The NSF employment estimate was derived from US Census Bureau data for 2011. According to the NSF estimates, there are 5,677,410 ± 37,585 scientists and engineers in the United States. Since the US population stands at about 315 million, this means that employed scientists and engineers are less than 2% of the total population. When you consider the percentage among the working population, it's 4.1%.
The following table lists the top ten states in terms of percentage science and engineering employment.
|Science and engineering employment as a percentage by state, with Washington DC, the largest employer (10.7%), included. The smallest percentage (1.7%) is Mississippi. A CSV file of these data can be found here. (Data from the NSF report.)|
One thing that always amazed me was the small number of my colleagues who were members of professional societies. As you can see, the membership numbers of these representative organizations below fall far short of five and a half million scientists and engineers.
Not surprisingly, some urban areas have a high concentration of science and engineering talent. Santa Clara, Los Angeles, San Diego, the New York metropolitan area, Denver and Houston, accounted for 13% of science and engineering workers. Nationwide, there were 3.1 million employed in computer or mathematical sciences occupation, and there were 1.7 million engineers. Of the remainder, 259,000 were in biological, agricultural, and environmental sciences, 368,000 in physical sciences, and 285,000 in social sciences. Social sciences would not have been included in my definition of science and engineering.
One quarter of people employed in science and engineering lived in the three most populous states; namely, California, Texas, and New York. Adding in Florida, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Massachusetts and Ohio accounted for fully half. Most states had a lower science and engineering employment intensity than the United States as a whole, which means that the median was remote from the mean.
Fifteen percent of approximately 3 million computer and mathematical sciences employees were concentrated in the New York metropolitan area, Santa Clara, Los Angeles, Denver, Fairfax County, Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Houston. Ten percent of the approximately two million engineers lived in Santa Clara, Houston, Los Angeles and San Diego.
The New York metropolitan area, San Diego, Los Angeles, Boston and Montgomery County, Maryland, employed 14% of the 259,000 life science workers. The physical sciences were concentrated in Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Clara, Oakland, Denver, Boston, Houston, and Montgomery County, Maryland. Seventeen percent of the nationwide total of 368,000 of physical scientists lived in these areas.
There are 285,000 social scientists nationwide. I'm not surprised that thirteen percent of these live in the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, and New York City.
- Beethika Khan and Jaquelina Falkenheim, "Regional Concentrations of Scientists and Engineers in the United States," NSF Report No. NSF 13-330 (August 2013), Science and Engineering Indicators Program, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation.
- Official 2013 Unit Membership Statistics, American Physical Society.
- Jamie Moesch, "IEEE Membership Tops 429 000," The Institute, March 8, 2013.
- American Chemical Society, Council Agenda, August 22, 2012.
- American Mathematical Society 2011-2012 Annual Report.
- ACM's Annual Report (2012), Association for Computing Machinery.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: STEM fields; science; technology; engineering; mathematics; American Mathematical Society; Washington, D.C.; National Security Agency; Fort Meade, Maryland; mathematician; citizenship in the United States; U.S. citizen; Wikimedia Commons; Pittsburgh; postdoctoral research; University of Pittsburgh; mile; North Jersey; Northern New Jersey; research; Northeastern United States; Northeast; New Jersey; National Science Foundation; statistics; scientist; engineer; United States; uniform distribution; uniformly distributed; U.S. state; oceanography; seacoast; experiment; experimental; particle physics; high energy physics; United States Census Bureau; data; demographics of the United States; US population; Washington DC; Mississippi; comma-separated values; CSV file; NSF report; District of Columbia; Maryland; >Massachusetts; Virginia; Colorado; Washington State; California; New Hampshire; New Jersey; Delaware; collegiality; colleague; professional association; professional society; American Physical Society; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; American Chemical Society; American Mathematical Society; Association for Computing Machinery; urban area; Santa Clara; Los Angeles; San Diego; New York metropolitan area; Denver; Houston; computer science; mathematical sciences; biology; biological; agriculture; agricultural; environmental science; physical sciences; social sciences; California; Texas; New York; Florida; Virginia; Pennsylvania; Illinois; Massachusetts; Ohio; median; mean; Denver; Fairfax County, Virginia; Boston; Montgomery County, Maryland; Oakland; social scientist; Works Progress Administration; Great Depression; Beethika Khan and Jaquelina Falkenheim, "Regional Concentrations of Scientists and Engineers in the United States," NSF Report No. NSF 13-330 (August 2013), Science and Engineering Indicators Program, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008