September 17, 2012
Our energy supply comes from a hodge-podge of sources, such as hydroelectric, coal/oil/natural gas, nuclear reactors; and recently the renewable energy technologies of solar photovoltaic. There's also wind power, which, like hydroelectric, is really another form of solar energy.
This is not an "Energy Blog," but so much science and technology concerns renewable energy that I've posted quite a few articles on the topic. Here are a few.
• There's a Hot Wind A-Blowin', May 7, 2012
Wind power is relatively low-tech compared with photovoltaics and some of the more exotic energy-harvesting principles I've described, and it's rather easy to implement. To an engineer, one turbine-generator is like any other, whether driven by the wind, steam, or flowing water.
Wind power produced a little more than a percent of US energy in 2010, but that present small percentage belies a huge global trend. As reported by the US Department of Energy in its 2010 Renewable Energy Data Book, October, 2011,
• Solar Energy Scorecard, April 30, 2012
• However the Wind Blows, February 7, 2012
• Ternary Pyrite Photovoltaics, December 15, 2011
• Kind of a Drag, August 10, 2011
• Taxing Times for Solar, July 28, 2011
• Manganese Photolysis of Water, June 1, 2011
• Salt Water Energy, May 20, 2011
• Titania Photocatalysis, February 16, 2011
• US Offshore Wind Strategy, February 15, 2011
• Pyrite Photovoltaics, January 24, 2011
• Bigger than a Butterfly, January 11, 2011
• Atlantic Wind Power, November 11, 2010
• Flutter Power, August 17, 2010
• Solar Salt, July 30, 2010
Worldwide, wind energy is one of the fastest growing renewable energy technologies - between 2000 and 2010, wind energy generation worldwide increased by a factor of 11. The United States experienced even more dramatic growth, as installed wind energy capacity increased by a factor of nearly 16 between 2000 and 2010.
Sometimes, scientists ask strange questions hoping to get interesting answers. Could scaling wind power from the present one percent to a hundred percent be practical? Could wind power provide all the world's energy needs?
Those are the questions that Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, and Cristina L. Archer, an associate professor of geography and physical ocean science and engineering at the University of Delaware, asked. Their answer to these questions, as presented in a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is that wind could supply several times the world's energy requirement by 2030.[2-4]
The human energy requirement in the year 2030 is projected to be 11.5 terawatts annually, but the problem is not just one of dividing this number by the annual power output of an isolated wind turbine to see how many you need. Previous studies have shown that turbines will steal wind from each other to lower overall efficiency; and wind turbines modify climate by mixing the layers of the atmosphere. I've reviewed both topics in previous articles.
The Stanford-Delaware scientists modified a computer model, called GATOR-GCMOM, to calculate the maximum power that might be extracted from the wind, taking into account the turbine-turbine interaction. The calculation divided the atmosphere into voxels, which are small volume regions, and it included factors such as water vapor content.[2-3] The model wasn't just concerned with the potential power available from wind turbines. It further calculated the affect of the turbines on global temperatures, moisture, clouds and climate.
The model assumed that wind turbines could be installed anywhere, without regard to things such as zoning laws or the economics of the installation. With this assumption, it was possible to calculate a saturation wind power potential, which is the maximum energy that can be extracted from Earth's winds by wind turbines. If you a able to place 100-meter-tall wind turbines over the entire (land plus water) surface of the Earth, this saturation point is an impressive 250 terawatts.
A more economically viable placement over just land and along the coasts would give 80 terawatts, which is significantly higher than requirements. From that reference point, the more expensive, or objectionable, turbines can be eliminated. If you could somehow site turbines at a six mile altitude, in the jet stream, an additional 380 terawatts can be extracted from the wind.[2,4]
Four million 5-megawatt 100 meter turbines could supply 7.5 terawatts, which is more than half the world's energy requirement, without significantly affecting the climate. [2-4] Half of these turbines would be on land, covering about 0.5% of the Earth's land area, and the other half over water. The land area would still be suitable for other purposes, such as farming. Says study co-author, Mark Jacobson,
"The careful siting of wind farms will minimize costs and the overall impacts of a global wind infrastructure on the environment... Regardless, as these results suggest, the saturation of wind power availability will not limit a clean-energy economy."
Says study co-author Cristina Archer,
"Wind power is very safe from the climate point of view... Everything comes at a price, but the price of wind power comes at a low cost in terms of climate impacts."
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and NASA.
- US Department of Energy, 2010 Renewable Energy Data Book, October, 2011.
- Andrew Myers, "Wind could meet many times world's total power demand by 2030, researchers say," Stanford University Press Release, September 10, 2012.
- Teresa Messmore, "Wind power's potential: UD-Stanford team calculates maximum global energy potential from wind," University of Delaware News, September 10, 2012.
- Mark Z. Jacobson and Cristina L. Archer, "Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., September 10, 2012, doi:10.1073/pnas.1208993109.
- Mark Z. Jacobson, "History of, Processes in, and Numerical Techniques in GATOR-GCMOM," Stanford University Web Site, August 22, 2012.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Energy; hodge-podge; hydroelectricity; hydroelectric; fossil-fuel power station; coal; oil; natural gas; nuclear reactor; renewable energy; technology; solar photovoltaic; wind power; solar energy; science; energy-harvesting; turbine-generator; steam; flowing water; US Department of Energy; 2010 Renewable Energy Data Book, October, 2011; scientist; Mark Z. Jacobson; professor; civil and environmental engineering; Stanford University; Cristina L. Archer; associate professor; geography; physical ocean science and engineering; University of Delaware; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; terawatt; climate; atmosphere of Earth; atmosphere; computer simulation; computer model; voxel; water vaporvglobal temperature; water vapor; moisture; cloud; zoning law; economics; Earth; meter; The War of the Worlds (1953 film); Windy Flats, Washington State; Wikimedia Commons; coast; reference point; altitude; jet stream; farming; National Science Foundation; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; NASA.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008