Shoulders of Giants
September 10, 2012
My high school physics course had a big affect on my scientific aspirations. Those were the days of PSSC Physics, so-called because it was developed by the Physical Sciences Study Committee in 1956. I wrote about PSSC Physics in a 2006 article (Learning Physics, August 18, 2006).
The objective of this "New Physics" counterpart of the "New Math" was to bring science education into the space age. The PSSC Physics course went against the normal mode of having students memorize a lot of facts. It was an attempt to teach the concepts of physics. It was a great course for a novice physicist, but many of the other students did not fare as well.
I especially enjoyed the laboratory experiments, which used simple devices to teach fundamental concepts. One especially ingenious device, called a "ripple tank," used water waves to teach optics. One striking feature of the physics classroom was a giant portrait of Isaac Newton, captioned with the "standing on the shoulders of giants" quotation that's often attributed to him.
The quotation, taken from a 1676 letter of Newton to Robert Hooke, is "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye sholders of Giants." We shouldn't be too surprised at seeing "shoulders" written as "sholders" in the same sentence as "ye." The phrase was apparently first used by Bernard of Chartres, and it's rendered in Latin as "...quasi nanos, gigantium humeris insidentes..." ("...like dwarfs on the shoulders of giants").
In earlier articles (George Heilmeier and the DARPA Questions, March 13, 2012 and Full Genome Sequencing, June 7, 2012), I remarked how science depends critically on instrumentation. Today, it's just as likely that we're doing our standing on the top of our spectrometers. Without such devices to assist the experimental verification of theory, science would not advance.
The trend seems to be towards very large, very expensive instruments. Galileo's telescope and Robert Hooke's microscope were not that expensive in their manufacture, but the Large Hadron Collider cost $9 billion, and NASA's James Webb Space Telescope rings in at about the same amount. Of course, there's the recent counterexample of how household adhesive tape was an essential part of the discovery of graphene.
Technology has been the enabler of sequencing of DNA. What was first a laborious chemical problem has now been the topic of many innovations in electronics and nanotechnology. If we were to make a map of technology areas in which their location is based on their connectedness, the kingdom of DNA analysis is moving ever slightly away from chemical country towards the electronic realm.
Such a map was prepared by an interdisciplinary team that posted its results at http://www.interdisciplinaryscience.net, as well as the arXiv preprint server. The map is a snapshot of the relatedness of patented technologies, as indexed in the International Patent Classification (IPC), based on citations from 2000-2006. This result, as shown in the figure below, is based on more than 760,000 patents in 400 IPC categories. A spreadsheet of the classifications can be found here.
A cursory look at this map shows three large areas. There are materials to the right, chemicals and pharmaceuticals to the left, and computing/communication at the bottom. As the authors of this map write, such maps would reveal new relationships between disparate technologies.
I agree, but the fundamental problem is finding those outliers in such a mass of data. Now that a baseline is established, I think some simple computer code can give a month-to-month indicator of newly building relationships. The study included a snapshot of the patent portfolios of Samsung and Dupont, overlaid on this technology map.
- The AAPT Celebrates PSSC's 50th Birthday, Compadre Net.
- Luciano Kay, Nils Newman, Jan Youtie, Alan L. Porter and Ismael Rafols, "Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance," Interdisciplinaryscience.net.
- Luciano Kay, Nils Newman, Jan Youtie, Alan L. Porter and Ismael Rafols, "Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance," arXiv Preprint Server, August 21, 2012.
- Supplementary file 1 for Ref. 3, Excel file containing the labels of IPC groupings, citation and similarity matrices, factor analysis of IPC groupings, University of Sussex Web Site.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: High school; physics; science; scientific; PSSC Physics; Physical Sciences Study Committee; New Math; science education; space age; rote learning; novice; physicist; laboratory; experiment; ripple tank; optics; classroom; portrait; Isaac Newton; standing on the shoulders of giants; quotation; Robert Hooke; Bernard of Chartres; Latin; Titan; Gustave Doré; Dante's Inferno; Wikimedia Commons; George Heilmeier; DARPA Questions; Full Genome Sequencing; scientific instrument; instrumentation; spectrometer; theory; Galileo Galilei; telescope; Robert Hooke; microscope; Large Hadron Collider; Cost; $9 billion; NASA; James Webb Space Telescope; household adhesive tape; graphene; DNA sequencing; chemical; electronics; nanotechnology; technology; interconnectivity; connectedness; interdisciplinarity; interdisciplinary; arXiv preprint server; International Patent Classification; citation; patent; material; chemical; pharmaceutical; computing; communication; Samsung; Dupont.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008