Tikalon Blog is now in archive mode.
An easily printed and saved version of this article, and a link
to a directory of all articles, can be found below: |
This article |
Directory of all articles |
Lynn Margulis
November 28, 2011
The superstars in
scientific fields are often lionized by the public, but the second stringers are generally unknown. Of course, second-stringers in science do make some very important contributions. The public knows
Albert Einstein, but if you mention
George Smoot to members of my generation, they are more likely to associate the name with the protectionist
Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, the history of which, for some reason, was much beloved by our American History teachers.
I think it was
James Thurber who thanked a
critic for his comment that he was a third-rate author. Thurber reasoned as follows: if Shakespeare was first rate, then authors such as
Herman Melville would necessarily be second-rate. Thurber was very comfortable being third-rate in such a
hierarchy.
Everyone knows
Charles Darwin, and a few outside the field of
evolutionary biology might recognize
Stephen Jay Gould because of his numerous books for general audiences. Then there's
Lynn Margulis, known among biologists for her theory that the
eukaryotic cell began as a
symbiotic union of primitive
prokaryotes, but likely unknown to the general public.
Margulis gave a talk at our institution about twenty years ago. She was likely passing through our area on the way to a more prestigious venue, and she presented a talk about the
Gaia hypothesis at a proper level for scientists who were not biologists. She must have been in her mid-fifties at the time, but she seemed to have the energy and enthusiasm of a young
graduate student. Lynn Margulis died on November 22, 2011, at age 73.[1-5]
Lynn Margulis, November 9, 2005, at the third Congreso sobre Comunicación Social de la Ciencia at La Coruña, Spain.
(Photo by Javier Pedreira, via Wikimedia Commons))
Lynn Margulis was born in
Chicago on March 5, 1938, as Lynn Petra Alexander.[1] A
precocious student, she entered college at the
University of Chicago at age fourteen, graduating with an
A.B. degree in
liberal arts at age eighteen in 1957.[4] She met her first husband,
Carl Sagan, while passing on a stairway at the University of Chicago.[2]
She went on to the
University of Wisconsin to earn a joint master's degree in
zoology and
genetics in 1960. From there it was graduate study at the
University of California, Berkeley, where she was granted a
Ph.D. in genetics in 1963; and then a
postdoctoral position at
Brandeis University. After Brandeis, Margulis joining the faculty of the
Department of Biology at
Boston University, where she remained for twenty-two years. She was Distinguished University Professor of
Geosciences at the
University of Massachusetts Amherst since 1988. [1,3-4]
Margulis' claim to fame was her 1967 paper in the
Journal of Theoretical Biology, "On the origin of mitosing cells," on the endosymbiotic theory of the origin of organelles. This theory was polished and republished in two books, "Origin of Eukarytic Cells," and "Symbiosis in Cell Evolution." [2] The 1967 paper was rejected by fifteen journals before being published, but this "
serial endosymbiotic theory" is now generally accepted for
mitochondria and
chloroplasts.[4]
The theory posited that Darwinian straight-line evolution wasn't the only mechanism available at the pre-organism, cellular level.
Eukaryotes (cells with
nuclei) may have evolved in symbiosis with
bacteria; that is, different organisms fused to create a
fitter organism.[1] Her theory was typically rejected without critical review, merely because it was somewhat
Lamarckian. Margulis thought that Lamark's ideas were rejected simply because he was
French, and Darwin was
English.[5] Margulis said that cellular symbiosis was not completely original with her, since it was proposed earlier in the
twentieth century by the
Russian biologist Marachovsky; and, in a book, "Symbioticism and Origins of Species," by Ivan Emmanual Wallin.[5]
Before Margulis hit the scene, evolutionary biology, as so effectively practiced by Gould,
Richard Lewontin and
Richard Dawkins, among others, was concerned with the
fossil record of organisms that inhabited the
Earth in the last 500 million years. This ignored earlier organisms that flourished 3.5 billion years before that time.[2] This ignored four of the
five kingdoms of life.[3] However, I think they can't be criticized too much, since the tools for in depth study of evolution in the distant past didn't exist until recently.
Margulis and son,
Dorion Sagan, wrote in their 1986 book, "Microcosmos,"
"More than 99.99 percent of the species that have ever existed have become extinct... But the planetary patina, with its army of cells, has continued for more than three billion years. And the basis of the patina, past, present and future, is the microcosm — trillions of communicating, evolving microbes." [2]
Perhaps because it was the macro version of her symbiosis theory, Margulis supported the
Gaia hypothesis of British
chemist James Lovelock. The Gaia hypothesis is that the Earth, taken as a composite of its
atmosphere,
geology and living organisms, is a
self-regulating system the seeks to maintain a
stasis.[1,3] Gould and Dawkins rejected Gaia by claiming that it wasn't a
scientific theory, and it was actually
poetry posing as a theory.[5] I confess that I thought Gaia to be too much of a
hippie love fest when it was proposed. Margulis tempered her support of Gaia by rejecting the same interpretation that I found troubling, that the Earth,
in toto, is a living organism.[5]
In a quotation that would also describe society's response to global warming, Margulis said,
"If science doesn't fit in with the cultural milieu, people dismiss science, they never reject their cultural milieu! If we are involved in science of which some aspects are not commensurate with the cultural milieu, then we are told that our science is flawed."[3]
Margulis' marriage to Carl Sagan ended in divorce. Her second marriage to Thomas N. Margulis, a chemist, also ended in divorce.[1] Lynn Margulis wrote, "I quit my job as a wife twice. It's not humanly possible to be a good wife, a good mother, and a first-class scientist."[3] Prominent physicist,
Mildred Dresselhaus, whom I profiled in a
previous article (Ms. Carbon, March 12, 2007), would disagree.
Margulis didn't like her being characterized as a scientific
feminist, or someone who endeavored to replace "red in tooth and claw" masculine concepts of nature with feminine ones.[5] Margulis was elected to membership in the
National Academy of Sciences in 1983. She received the
Darwin-Wallace Medal from the
Linnean Society and the 1999
National Medal of Science.[3]
References:
- Bruce Weber (The New York Times), "Obituary: Lynn Margulis / Trailblazing evolution theorist," Pittsburgh Post Gazette, November 25, 2011.
- Bruce Weber, "Lynn Margulis, Evolution Theorist, Dies at 73," The New York Times, November 24, 2011.
- Kelly Fiveash, "'Rebel' biologist and neo-Darwinian skeptic Lynn Margulis dies," The Register (UK), November 24, 2011.
- Lynn Margulis dies, National Center for Science Education, November 23, 2011.
- John Horgan, "R.I.P. Lynn Margulis, Biological Rebel," Scientific American Blog, November 24, 2011
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Science; scientific field; Albert Einstein; George Smoot; Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930; James Thurber; critic; Herman Melville; hierarchy; Charles Darwin; evolutionary biology; Stephen Jay Gould; Lynn Margulis; eukaryotic cell; symbiosis; symbiotic union; prokaryote; Gaia hypothesis; graduate student; Javier Pedreira; Wikimedia Commons; Chicago; precocious; University of Chicago; A.B. degree; iberal arts; Carl Sagan; University of Wisconsin; zoology; genetics; University of California, Berkeley; Ph.D.; postdoctoral; Brandeis University; Department of Biology; Boston University; Geoscience; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Journal of Theoretical Biology; serial endosymbiotic theory; mitochondria; chloroplast; Eukaryotes; nucleus; bacteria; survival of the fittest; Lamarckism; Lamarckian; French; English; twentieth century; Russian; Richard Lewontin; Richard Dawkins; fossil record; Earth; five kingdoms of life; Dorion Sagan; Gaia hypothesis; chemist; James Lovelock; atmosphere; geology; self-regulating system; homeostasis; stasis; scientific theory; poetry; hippie; Mildred Dresselhaus; feminist; National Academy of Sciences; Darwin-Wallace Medal; Linnean Society; National Medal of Science.