Preventing Market Bubbles
December 4, 2013
The simple market model of supply and demand was always reassuring. When people need much more of something, driving up prices, equilibrium forces would work to generate a greater supply. Today's markets, however, are quite a bit more complex.
In the past, everyone knew how much an apple should cost, the price being not that much different this year than last. In contrast, faulty valuation of something unfamiliar, such as the initial public offering (IPO) of an Internet company, can lead to huge upstream corrections in valuation and a market bubble.
With money moving at the speed of light, at least the slightly reduced speed of light in fiberoptic communications cables, a regulator's ability to control a market firestorm using tools such as a trading halt or trading curb is severely limited. A regulator would have a fighting chance if a model existed that could predict a market bubble.
When chaos was discovered, people got the idea that the stock market might be chaotic. Although we can cite much anecdotal evidence, this idea is not proven, since the stock market is not a typical experimental system. There are, however, quite a number of scientific papers written about the idea, such as the ones cited as refs. 2-3.[2-3] Large events in most systems follow a scale-free (power law) probability distribution, so extreme events are not predicted.
A recent paper in Physical Review Letters notes the similarity between extreme, catastrophic events, such as market bubbles, and the performance of a system of coupled chaotic oscillators.[4-6] What's interesting in this paper is the presentation of a model that forecasts an impending extreme event. What's more interesting is that the forecasted extreme events can be suppressed by application of small perturbations to the system.[4-5]
The authors presented the design of their chaotic oscillator system in a previous article. This circuit, and its response, is shown in the figure.
The central prediction problem, as summarized in the power density function shown below, is that extreme events should be rare; but, every so often a killer event, termed a "Dragon King" by the research team, arises. The Dragon King concept was explained by coauthor, Didier Sornette, at a recent TED conference.
|Chaotic oscillator circuit and its response. Component values are as follow: R1 = 46.50 kΩ, R = 14.86 kΩ, R2 = 14.85 kΩ, RE = 14.86 kΩ, RL = 512 Ω, R3 = 14.85 kΩ, C1 = 0.01473 μF, C2 = 0.01483 μF, C3 = 0.01483 μF; D1 and D2 are 1N4148 diodes; the operational amplifiers OP1 and OP2 are LF411CN. The circuit is driven by a four volt, 770 Hz, sine wave. (Image sources: Left, fig. 1, and right, fig. 3, from ref. 6, via arXiv.)|
Didier Sornette, who is with the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, is director of the Financial Crisis Observatory, a group whose goal is the prediction of such market disturbances. His coauthors on this study are Dan Gauthier, a professor of physics at Duke University, Gauthier's former postdoc, Hugo Cavalcante, now at the Federal University of Paraiba (Brazil), Edward Ott of the University of Maryland (College Park, Maryland), and Marcos Oria from the Federal University of Paraiba.
Gauthier has been doing experiments with chaos-generating electrical circuits, such as the one shown above, since the 1990s. When identical such circuits are coupled, they will synchronize when there is tight coupling of the circuits, but a lighter coupling will allow excursions in the phase space trajectory of one oscillator with respect to the other.
During an experiment, the chaotic trajectory will visit a region of phase space at which an extreme event might occur. In such a region, the circuits will temporarily lose synchronization, leading to mostly small changes, but sometimes a very large change, similar to a market crash. Most disturbances follow a power law distribution, but the extreme events deviate from it.
The research team found that they could prevent such "dragon kings" if they applied a small signal to one of the circuits at just the right time. Says Gauthier, "Maybe tiny nudges can make a big difference," but he adds,
|Power density function for market events.|
The x-axis is the largest peak value within a burst.
(Fig. 2 of ref. 5, via arXiv.)
"The limitation of our paper is that we haven't shown that our circuit has relevance to the stock market... We aren't yet sure where to look, but for this one simple system, we figured out how to find it."
It's hard to publish in Physical Review Letters, and this paper was no exception. Gauthier says that the team needed to allay the concerns of a difficult team of reviewers before it could be published. The research was funded in part by the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Army Research Office.
- Tom Konrad, "Chaos Theory, Financial Markets, and Global Weirding," Forbes, August 30, 2011.
- Taisei Kaizoji, "Speculative bubbles and fat tail phenomena in a heterogeneous agent model," arXiv Preprint Server, December 19, 2003.
- Sorin Vlad, Paul Pascu and Nicolae Morariu, "Chaos Models in Economics," arXiv Preprint Server, January 20, 2010.
- Hugo L. D. de S. Cavalcante, Marcos Oriá, Didier Sornette, Edward Ott and Daniel J. Gauthier, "Predictability and suppression of extreme events in a chaotic system," Physical Review Letters, vol. 111, no. 19 (November 8, 2013), Document No. 198701 (5 pages).
- Hugo L. D. de Souza Cavalcante, Marcos Oriá, Didier Sornette, Edward Ott and Daniel J. Gauthier, "Predictability and suppression of extreme events in complex systems," arXiv Preprint Server, September 13, 2013.
- Market Bubbles May Be Predictable, Controllable, Duke University Press Release, October 17, 2013.
- Gilson F. de Oliveira Jr., Hugo L. D. de Souza Cavalcante, Orlando di Lorenzo, Martine Chevrollier, Thierry Passerat de Silans and Marcos Oriá, "Tunable power law in the desynchronization events of coupled chaotic electronic circuits," arXiv Preprint Server, September 12, 2003.
- Didier Sornette, "How we can predict the next financial crisis," TED, June, 2013.
Permanent Link to this article
Linked Keywords: Market; economic model; supply and demand; unit price; economic equilibrium; equilibrium forces; apple; intrinsic value; valuation; initial public offering; dot-com company; Internet company; market bubble; money; speed of light; refractive index; optical fiber cable; fiberoptic communications cable; regulatory agency; regulator; trading halt; trading curb; New York Stock Exchange; postcard; Wikimedia Commons; chaos theory; stock market; anecdotal evidence; experiment; experimental; science; scientific; academic publishing; power law; probability distribution; Physical Review Letters; coupled chaotic oscillator; electronic circuit; operational amplifier; hertz; Hz; sine wave; arXiv; spectral density; power density function; Didier Sornette; TED conference; Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; Financial Crisis Observatory; Dan Gauthier; professor; physics; Duke University; postdoctoral research; postdoc; Federal University of Paraiba (Brazil); Edward Ott; University of Maryland (College Park, Maryland); synchronization of chaos; phase space; stock market crash; peer review; U.S. Office of Naval Research; United States Army Research Laboratory; Army Research Office.
Latest Books by Dev Gualtieri
Thanks to Cory Doctorow of BoingBoing for his favorable review of Secret Codes!
Blog Article Directory on a Single Page
- J. Robert Oppenheimer and Black Holes - April 24, 2017
- Modeling Leaf Mass - April 20, 2017
- Easter, Chicks and Eggs - April 13, 2017
- You, Robot - April 10, 2017
- Collisions - April 6, 2017
- Eugene Garfield (1925-2017) - April 3, 2017
- Old Fossils - March 30, 2017
- Levitation - March 27, 2017
- Soybean Graphene - March 23, 2017
- Income Inequality and Geometrical Frustration - March 20, 2017
- Wireless Power - March 16, 2017
- Trilobite Sex - March 13, 2017
- Freezing, Outside-In - March 9, 2017
- Ammonia Synthesis - March 6, 2017
- High Altitude Radiation - March 2, 2017
- C.N. Yang - February 27, 2017
- VOC Detection with Nanocrystals - February 23, 2017
- Molecular Fountains - February 20, 2017
- Jet Lag - February 16, 2017
- Highly Flexible Conductors - February 13, 2017
- Graphene Friction - February 9, 2017
- Dynamic Range - February 6, 2017
- Robert Boyle's To-Do List for Science - February 2, 2017
- Nanowire Ink - January 30, 2017
- Random Triangles - January 26, 2017
- Torricelli's law - January 23, 2017
- Magnetic Memory - January 19, 2017
- Graphene Putty - January 16, 2017
- Seahorse Genome - January 12, 2017
- Infinite c - January 9, 2017
- 150 Years of Transatlantic Telegraphy - January 5, 2017
- Cold Work on the Nanoscale - January 2, 2017
- Holidays 2016 - December 22, 2016
- Ballistics - December 19, 2016
- Salted Frogs - December 15, 2016
- Negative Thermal Expansion - December 12, 2016
- Verbal Cues and Stereotypes - December 8, 2016
- Capacitance Sensing - December 5, 2016
- Gallium Nitride Tribology - December 1, 2016
- Lunar Origin - November 27, 2016
- Pumpkin Propagation - November 24, 2016
- Math Anxiety - November 21, 2016
- Borophene - November 17, 2016
- Forced Innovation - November 14, 2016
- Combating Glare - November 10, 2016
- Solar Tilt and Planet Nine - November 7, 2016
- The Proton Size Problem - November 3, 2016
- Coffee Acoustics and Espresso Foam - October 31, 2016
- SnIP - An Inorganic Double Helix - October 27, 2016
- Seymour Papert (1928-2016) - October 24, 2016
- Mapping the Milky Way - October 20, 2016
- Electromagnetic Shielding - October 17, 2016
- The Lunacy of the Cows - October 13, 2016
- Random Coprimes and Pi - October 10, 2016
- James Cronin (1931-2016) - October 6, 2016
- The Ubiquitous Helix - October 3, 2016
- The Five-Second Rule - September 29, 2016
- Resistor Networks - September 26, 2016
- Brown Dwarfs - September 22, 2016
- Intrusion Rheology - September 19, 2016
- Falsifiability - September 15, 2016
- Fifth Force - September 12, 2016
- Renal Crystal Growth - September 8, 2016
- The Normality of Pi - September 5, 2016
- Metering Electrical Power - September 1, 2016
Deep Archive 2006-2008